Is there life or has there ever been any life on Mars? In the article, What’s the Actual Evidence for Life on Mars?, four questions were proposed and answered. The article was well-written, but there is evidence that the article is not totally accurate- through no fault of the author.
A planetary investigator, Joseph P. Skipper, has much to say about Mars, part of it being that NASA doctors the photos in order to keep us ignorant. Does he have evidence that the pictures were doctored? Yes. On the website is the documented proof that NASA is not releasing photos as they were taken, and he is not the only scientist complaining about tampered evidence.
Skipper writes, “That’s the wonderful thing about hard visual evidence. Those that we’ve trusted for so long tell us one thing about how to think and perceive but just too much of the evidence drawn right from their own science data tells a very obvious considerably different story. The question is, are you going to believe what you’re told to believe or believe what your own eyes can see and verify in this science data as demonstrated above?”
So lets take a look at what the answers might be to three out of the four questions.
1. Is there life on Mars? Joseph Skipper believes he has found tree forests similar to the tree forests on Earth. He believes there is more than one type of life forms, although some life might be totally alien to the life we have on Earth. For instance, he believes there is some type of specie that requires concentrated solar radiation and shallow water, but that it does not live solely in the water.
One of the scientific sound theories he has is that there is (humanoid?) intelligent life on Mars, quite possibly with technology that bypasses ours. His theories are founded on good science, and anyone with a solid interest in understanding the dynamics of what NASA isn’t admitting will want to include his work in their studies.
On the Mars Anomaly website is a statement from Joseph Skipper. “In my work based on the evidence I’ve seen, I’ve come to the opinion that Mars appears to be populated by multiple ambitious specie civilizations, including the human specie, most with technology advancement beyond our own. However, this line of evidence is different in that it may have little ambitions beyond its own survival and proliferation on the planet.”
But if you were hoping that he would say that face discovered on the Mars surface is proof of life then you will be disappointed. It is only a visual illusion caused from the terrain.
2. What is living on Mars like? According to NASA, Mars is not inhabitable due to severe temperatures, lack of available water and the makeup of the atmosphere. Unfortunately for NASA, their claims of it being a red planet is being proved to be a falsity along with their claims of running water. The atmosphere is not drowned by a dusty haze. It is in fact very clear. And according to the scientists at JPL, the temperature on the ground is between 5-37 degrees Fahrenheit.
Scientists from JPL have proven that NASA does indeed change colors of photos in order to present a harsh red atmosphere. Why would they do that? Only NASA can tell us what their motives are however, due to the photo doctoring what appears to be red dirt is chunks of iron ore. So who knows what else is there- money does talk you know.
The website Mars Anomalies goes in depth with the theories of what living like Mars is like.
3. When will humans land on Mars? Well, depends on the government. But there is a possibility that humans are on Mars right now, or at least have lived there in the past. Mr. Skipper is a firm supporter of a live human specie presently on Mars. If so, the question should be “When will humans from Earth land on Mars?”
One of the most controversial topics is whether aliens exist and if so, did they create us. This topic cannot be forgotten when discussing Mars. Too many people for too long has believed that our progenitors either came from Mars or that it is part of a cosmic alien highway.
Too many people have their religions centered around either the premise that a God created us or that an alien developed us through genetic manipulation of an existing life form. Some has asked “Is it possible that NASA has chosen not to release evidence that negates the majority of religious beliefs?”
I ask, “Or is it simply a matter of monetary gain for those ‘in the know’?” Take a look at the new Space Policy that the White House and Bush released earlier this year. That should answer the question quite nicely.